You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
thats a great article Lauren .and i think its poignant that it refers to a "loss" of hair pigment /colour as being trigered by a "mutation"other than greys i can t think of another common instance when a "loss" of pigment / colour progressively occours ......other than in Apaloosa coat patterns .....ie COLOURING OUT /LP ROANING
_________________ life without horses & chocolate just wouldn t be worth living!
sarah x
LP Roaning?? Are you specifically singling this out as different from classic roaning (ie: the chromosomal mutation of kit/eca3) ?
The commong understanding of classic roan is, and I quote:
Quote:
Roan is not progressive - a horse will be born Roan (although it is usually not visible until the foal is a few months old) and will be Roan until it dies.
Therefore the phenotype of an Rr or RR horse can be considered as a stable-from-birth coat modifier - even if it's not visually obvious at first.
_________________ Dan Reeves, Animal Genetics UK - Always happy to talk about horse DNA and colour genetics - but don't expect me to know anything about dressage!!
yes Dan its i believe a "Shiela Archer " term ......used for horses who "colour out" (another Appaloosa term describing the progressive loss of base colour eventually to white sometimes revealing spots underneath .....sometimes just leaving "varnish marks " ( another Appaloosa term given to the pigment often left on the boney extremities eg along nasil bones,knees , "arm pits ",hocks , possibly around eyes .
i ll see if i can find some examples to show you
LP ROAN was i believe mapped and found to have NO DNA link to KIT /"classic " (stable non progressive roan ) .
_________________ life without horses & chocolate just wouldn t be worth living!
sarah x
Unlike other "White Patterns" like the various Pinto patterns and Roan, the "LP" Appaloosa coloring often changes color patterning considerably through the horse's lifetime.
this is the fact that puzzles me so much and makes me keep wondering does this "colour change /LP roaning /colouring out "hold some sort of link to the "mutation" that triggers the onset of GREY ? ......To ME the 2 processes (colouring out / LP ROANING & GREYING )"SEEM" so similar in thier action
but then as geneticists keep proving not everything is ALWAYS as it "SEEMS"
you d be a better judge Dan ......any thoughts ?
loads more info / links cited here on the original "GREY " THREAD
Two paternal half sib families segregating for the LP locus and including a total of 47 offspring were used to perform a genome scan which localized LP to horse chromosome 1 (ECA1).
I don't know how old the article is, and I don't know if since it was written there has been any kind of daylight on the way in which KIT is mutated to cause classic roan.
It's possibly just a single-nucleotide mutation, but who's to say it's not caused another inversion near to the KIT gene? - just much smaller than the one responsible for Tobiano. That was mapped as 100kb away from KIT, that's 100,000 nucleotides! If it is just an SNP, it may take a very very long time to find it.
its getting a bit over my head
i was aware that a link between LP & the KIT mutation had been ruled out but that nearly all the other white pattern genes inc "Classic" (stable ) Roan do link to KIT
i m sorry i m getting confused
the part i can t get my head around is that as far as im aware (but am open to correction ......as things are changing /advancing fast )is that all the "white" patterns that can be linked to KIT are all "Stable" /non progressive in loss of pigment /colour .....BUT ......LP ROAN & GREY are both "unstable " & BOTH progressively loose pigment from thier birth base coat colours ...........there maybe absolutely no link between the two ......i m not a geneticist nor do i pretend to have the knowledge to make a valid judgement BUT .....I DO have a very strong gut instinct ( that is very possibly completely wrong .......but its remained strong for a long time now and i have listend to many arguements and without dismissing them none of them have changed how i percieve all of this )
but to me a layperson the similarties are striking .........but i seem alone in these thoughts
i sure that DNA will eventually reveal the truth whatever that maybe
_________________ life without horses & chocolate just wouldn t be worth living!
sarah x
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum